Alan Morrison devoted half a page to its praises in the Sunday Herald, but Monday-to-Saturday readers of The Herald may not have been guided to Biffy Clyro's album Opposites.
While our news pages have recorded its ascent to the top of the album charts, the fact it is a contemporary rock album that should make many bigger US names look to their laurels has perhaps not been emphasised. Since Morrison's review, still accessible on heraldscotland.com, Scottish album success has become the phenomenon of the start of the year, with Pedestrian Verse by Selkirk's Frightened Rabbit in the top 10 and Emile Sande's Our Version of Events having taken up permanent residence there.
Had things gone according to plan in the placing of creativity at the centre of devolved Scotland, this would be a marvellous advert for the nation. Instead the words "Creative Scotland" have become synonymous with a misconceived notion of how the state should relate to the arts, and the local authority in Moray has followed the path of Newcastle in illustrating how vulnerable any arts spending is at a time of austerity. The new arts body won praise for its active engagement with popular music from the sector, which was drowned out by the – perfectly valid, for the most part – criticism of the way it fulfilled its role with respect to other branches of the arts. There will be no quick fix for this: it is difficult to rebrand something brought into being by legislation.
But this week the words of Harriet Harman, Labour's shadow culture secretary as well as deputy leader, suggested there is a consciousness in some quarters that the rhetoric needs to change. "We are talking about subsidy, not investment, because investment implies some kind of immediate calculable return – whereas it's really a much longer, deeper process," she said.
Unlike some others in senior cultural posts in politics, Harman, whose daughter is a successful professional musician, knows of what she speaks. Her choice of words should be heeded not just in Newcastle and Moray, but also in Waverley Gate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article