There is something astonishing about this rare double bill of short plays by Caryl Churchill, if only to get some kind of insight into how the mind of this most singular of writers works.
In Far Away, first seen in 2000, a young girl is exposed to the brutality of a war which becomes increasingly extreme. At first, Lucy Hollis's Joan appears to be an evacuee who witnesses her uncle doling out violence to a lorry-load of refugees, only to be co-opted into a conspiracy of silence by her aunt.
By the end, she is in the thick of a conflict which has corrupted the planet so much that even nature and the animal kingdom are taking sides.
Seagulls, which dates from 1978, is less elliptical in its observation of how raw talent can be corrupted by celebrity. Kathryn Howden's Valery is able to move objects with her mind, and, with her manager Di in tow, is about to launch a rocket for charity in front of a huge audience before being investigated by scientists at Harvard. Except, with the pressure on, she cannot perform.
Director Dominic Hill has pulled out all the stops here, with Far Away in particular a technical marvel which has each scene punctuated by designer Neil Haynes's huge corrugated iron doors sliding open and shut as Scott Twynholm's dissonant industrial score plays.
A mid-scene fashion parade proves even more jaw- dropping.
The plays themselves, featuring a set of wonderfully nuanced performances from Hollis, Howden, Alasdair Hankinson and Maureen Carr, are fiercely moral fables, even as they are shot through with a wry wit.
It is Valery's moment of stillness at the end of Seagulls, however, that is most telling.
✶ ✶ ✶ ✶
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article