Three stars / Two stars
2 Guns (15)
Dir: Baltasar Kormakur
With: Mark Wahlberg, Denzel Washington
Runtime: 109 minutes
The two guns of Baltasar Kormakur's amiable actioner go by the character names of Bobby and Stig, but you can call them Denzel (Washington) and Mark (Wahlberg). Like a Scottish summer needs sunshine, these two screen stars raise the brightness and fun levels of what would otherwise be a run of the mill shoot 'em up.
As pairings go, think Robert De Niro and Charles Grodin in Midnight Run; think Murphy and Nolte in 48 Hours; think Planes, Trains and Automobiles with firepower instead of credit cards. Think whatever you like, but don't think too much lest the endearing daftness of the piece is diluted.
Kormakur (The Deep) worked with Wahlberg on the thriller Contraband, a solid, old school slice of entertainment. The same label could be applied to this tale of undercover agents trying to infiltrate a drugs cartel, only to find they have stirred up quite the hornets' nest.
When we first meet them, Bobby and Stig are in a diner, shooting the breeze. Their conversational rhythm swings along like jazz, one cute line zinging off the next. The audience can relax. This double act, we are assured from the off, are going to spark nicely off each other.
From the diner, Kormakur cuts to one week earlier and the tale begins in earnest. Who is the cool, debonair Bobby really? And what gives Stig such swagger? These two don't seem like your typical hired muscle, there to protect a cross border drug smuggling operation between America and Mexico. Which side they are on is soon revealed. That settled, Kormakur ups the mayhem level a little more.
Adapted from the graphic novels by Steven Grant, 2 Guns rocks along as if we are watching the pages of a comic book being flipped at speed. Check out that gunfight there, that stand-off here, pause a moment while the love interest (Paula Patton) is introduced. Just when the pieces of the story appear to have fallen into place, Kormakur shakes things up again.
As skilful as the Icelandic director is in assembling a story, the heavy lifting here is done by the two Mr Ws, Wahlberg and Washington. They make such a winning comedy couple it is a wonder no one has thought of bringing them together before. Washington takes on the role of older, wiser guy to Wahlberg's loose cannon, the big dog to the puppyish Stig, leaving the younger guy to vacuum up the funniest lines.
Plenty of others, including Patton and James Marsden as a military guy in the mix, try to get a look-in but this is the Washington and Wahlberg show, and Kormakur knows it. Through sheer force of screen presence, they hold the picture together when the story becomes too confusing for its own good.
The narrative is so chaotic at times it makes the storyline of It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World look positively sane. When one character asks what the heck is going on one can only nod in sympathy with his befuddlement.
The odd couple also do the business when any pretence at logic and believability has bitten the dust. That's what star power can do in a movie like this, and Washington and Wahlberg give it their all. At a relatively brisk 109 minutes, Kormakur's show leaves the road before any boredom sets in or the audience can look too closely at the tale. Two screen guns have gone to war, and come back with a result.
Planes 3D
Dir: Klay Hall
Voices: Dane Cook, Teri Hatcher
Runtime: 92 minutes
Flying into a cinema near you as the school holidays draw to a close is Disney's patchy and bland animated tale of an ordinary little plane, Dusty Crophopper, who dreams of zipping through the skies like
a jet one day and winning a round the world race.
Lots of famous voices, including John Cleese (playing Bulldog the British plane, natch), Teri Hatcher and Julia Louis-Dreyfus turn up to give some personality to the animated lumps of metal, some succeeding more than others.
As with Cars, plane-spotting kids will either be entranced by the noisy contraptions and the wacky races on offer in Klay Hall's picture, or, more likely, bored stiff.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article