So, the great man has been praised, mourned and laid to rest in his homeland.
Now, in an apt piece of timing, comes the story of his life. Unfortunately, and as much as I'd prefer otherwise, it feels like a remarkable story told in an unremarkable way.
Based on Nelson Mandela's famed autobiography, it concerns the passage of his life up to becoming South Africa's first black president in 1994, all of which is entwined with his country's turbulent history of apartheid.
It starts with a glance at Mandela as a young boy in his tribal village in the Transkei, where he is given a forename that translates, presciently, as "troublemaker". But the film focuses on his adult life, from 1942 in Johannesburg, where he works as a lawyer who has the temerity to represent clients in courts dominated by white lawyers.
At first Mandela (Idris Elba) is a reluctant, even unlikely hero - a ladies' man unfaithful to his first wife and seemingly as devoted to his love life as to good works, a committed lawyer who doubts the ANC's potential for bringing change. But the government's increasing persecution of black South Africans - the enforcement of apartheid from 1948, the creation of black townships, the Sharpeville massacre in 1960 - all drive him towards greater engagement and militancy. "If they want a war," he eventually declares, "we will give them a war."
In this time he also meets his second wife, Winnie (Naomie Harris). They have two children before Mandela - whose sabotage of government buildings has made him one of the country's most wanted men - is finally captured, tried and imprisoned on Robben Island in 1964.
Thereafter what feels like a race through history understandably slows down, as the man who has become known as "Madiba" spends 27 years in captivity. As the film's subject becomes disconnected from the fight against apartheid outside his prison walls, the film loses some spark.
That said, as the white government starts to falter, Mandela's wily political instincts and innate goodness come into their own, combining in his negotiations for his release to steer the country towards a democracy no-one could have imagined.
The second half of the film also offers an account of much-maligned Winnie, who not only became the anti-apartheid campaign's visible figurehead in her husband's absence, fighting tirelessly for his release, but was herself imprisoned - including 16 months in solitary confinement - something that the film suggests hardened her personality. Harris is very good indeed at conveying Winnie's transformation from a joyous young woman to a tough, even cruel radical - a change in spirit that creates a wedge between husband and wife greater than his imprisonment.
Elba, too, is excellent. I don't think the actor could ever wholly hide his trademark rolling gait, and it's here sometimes in all its goofy glory. Otherwise, he disappears into his real-life character, sometimes unrecognisable not because of prosthetics as much as the commitment of the performance. And it's a performance very much as Mandela himself would have wanted it - warts and all.
If only the direction of the film was not so workmanlike. Justin Chadwick does elicit our anger, outrage and sadness when conveying the racism and savagery of apartheid South Africa - it's almost impossible not to. At the same time, his pacing of the narrative often sags, and the tone feels unnecessarily staid. To be fair, there is an awful weight of history upon this; but I'm not sure the film needed to replicate that history's very long walk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article