London Grammar
London Grammar
O2 ABC, Glasgow
Ken Neil
CAN Jools Holland still be so influential or is it simply that, thanks to the internet, acts of high quality sometimes get the breaks they deserve? Whichever, the devoted, sell-out crowd at the O2 ABC was testament to the impact that London Grammar have made on their short journey from YouTube to major label success.
The sense of anticipation was evident. But could they keep their intimacy and finely-honed production sound in the larger venues that their elevated status now affords them?
Hannah Reid's diamond-clear enunciation rested on a rich velvet bed of lush electronica and understated guitar laid down gently by Daniel Rothman and Dot Major. It spoke of lonely 3am rooms and provided the perfect accompaniment to Wasting My Young Years and Metal & Dust, meditations on the vagaries of relationships and the insecurities of youth.
Here, in a low-lit room full of music, such introspection did not exclude the audience but was inviting. Lazy comparisons have been made between Reid and contemporaries like Florence Welch (of Florence And The Machine fame) but in truth her clarity of tone and delivery has antecedents in a long line of English girl singers going back to the 1960s folk revival. Indeed, London Grammar might be new folk for now people.
There were moments when they seemed too refined, the reins held too tight, and a change of tempo would have been nice.
This was provided by brief forays to a live drumkit by Major that added welcome heft, especially to set closer Shyer. However, rocking out is not what they do; instead they take us to quiet, intimate places and make a large venue seem comfortably small.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article