NME Awards Tour
NME Awards Tour
O2 Academy, Glasgow
Jonathan Geddes
If last year's NME Tour returned bands to the forefront after recent intrusions by hip-hop and dance acts, then this year was even more indebted to past glories. The result was an evening heavy on machismo-scented guitar bands, in a venue well short of capacity.
The opening slot fell to Circa Waves, who played the sort of jittery guitar-pop the magazine is most associated with. It strove to be excitable, but was so generic, like a historical excavation of Britpop's more banal acts, that it was forgotten almost immediately.
Brighton duo Royal Blood were more striking. A two-man set-up may instantly suggest the Black Keys, but their loud, hard-hitting sound displayed a debt to Black Sabbath and sludgy, primordial noise. They battered through songs sounding like an explosion in a fireworks factory, and swaggered around with assurance.
The dreamy pop of Temples struck the lightest note, although they also dipped into sprawling psychedelic jams to go with hazy melodies, and Keep In The Dark crunched along, reminiscent of Spirit In The Sky. Yet their stage presence was frustratingly timid, making the set all too passive.
Lastly came Interpol. A group gearing up for their fifth album headlining a tour devoted to fresh music seemed odd, even if they did drop three new songs in.
The best, undoubtedly, was My Desire, with a strutting drumbeat and seedy guitar work, but the sharp-suited New Yorkers mostly ran through old tunes, with C'mere and Obstacle 1 suitably driving.
The remainder, though, were simply efficient, and Paul Banks's voice was often submerged, even on Slow Hands, their hit from 2004 that sparked the biggest crowd response.
The shock of the new seemed awfully far away though.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article