This May Hurt A Bit
This May Hurt A Bit
Traverse Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
It's a strange sensation, hearing an actor open Max Stafford-Clark's production of Stella Feehily's impassioned call to arms to save the NHS with Socialist firebrand Aneurin Bevan's speech that launched this most treasured of institutions in 1948.
A politician with ideals and integrity is such a rarity these days that it can't help but sound heroic. That is also true of watching a piece of theatrical agit-prop, a form that not that long ago was considered to be passe, but which now appears to have been reborn for the age of austerity with a vigorous sense of righteous urgency.
This is with good cause, as Feelihy proves in the play's central tale of one family's travails after their 90-year-old mother Iris has a stroke.
A sadly familiar story of over-crowded and understaffed hospital wards is punctuated by a series of sketch-like interludes, as Bevan and Winston Churchill step out of the audience to form a double act, and a weather girl points out exactly where all the health cuts have been made. Even Death himself makes a cameo appearance.
Drawn from extensive interviews with hospital patients and staff, as well as first-hand experience, Feelihy, Stafford-Clark and an eight-strong cast led by Stephanie Cole as Iris, have produced a damning indictment of a government that puts corporate interests before saving lives that is both funny and full of bemused rage.
When one character steps out to ask the audience "Why aren't people angry?", the silence may be deafening, but the way Westminster's current occupants are going, it should not be that way for long.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article