Augustines
Augustines
Arches, Glasgow
Jonathan Geddes
Augustines had barely finished one song, and already came a declaration of love from a chap in the crowd, aimed at the group's singer Billy McCarthy. Many more followed as the night wore on, for the Brooklyn outfit are a band that people in believe on a level that goes beyond them possessing decent tunes.
When McCarthy conducted the crowd on various choruses, it was less call and respond and more a preacher calling out to his flock. Perhaps that is due to his cathartic lyricism that draws emotion out like the proverbial moth to the flame or perhaps it's the onstage presence, which at times channelled the zealous, sweat-soaked spirit of Joe Strummer, and not just because the guitars looked pretty battered.
Musical comparisons to the Clash sprang to mind too, including a run-through of Guns of Brixton's gangster mythologising in the encore. A closer link, though, would be Bruce Springsteen's most chest-beating, blue-collar storytelling. For all that songs were flavoured with brass and strings, the majority plucked from their two albums were muscular, armsaloft rockers.
There was an aggressive kick to Balled Of A Patient Man, a thrilling cry on Cruel City and an emotional build on Now You Are Free. It was rousing, with the only quibble being the group, much like contemporaries the Gaslight Anthem, relying too much on such rock when a dash of variety can help a set.
Yet the lengthy encore, which included a cameo by Frightened Rabbit's Billy Kennedy, was superb. It featured a clutch of songs performed on the floor, audience circled around Augustines and joined in communal sing-along, a sight stirring enough to fully place your faith in them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article