Doctor Who boss Steven Moffat has said that handsome actors do not fit the bill when it comes to playing the Time Lord.
Moffat said that Matt Smith, the former Doctor who became something of a sex symbol, and new incumbent Peter Capaldi were attractive, but only in an "odd way".
He told Radio Times magazine that one of the reasons that he picked Capaldi was that The Thick Of It star was odd-looking, while Smith is the "strangest looking man" from a certain angle.
"There is something about Peter's demeanour, his eyes, his attitude - he's tremendously bright and that comes out on screen.
"When you choose a Doctor, you want somebody who is utterly compelling, attractive in a very odd way.
"None of the Doctors are conventionally attractive, but they're all arresting. Handsome men don't quite suit."
He added: "Matt Smith's a young, good-looking bloke from one angle but is actually the strangest looking man from another.
"You need that oddity; you need somebody who is carved out of solid star...."
Moffat said: "I always thought Matt, while a very young man, had something of the demeanour of a much older man, whereas Peter is a man in his 50s but is terribly boyish and young at times. I like the Doctors to have mixed messages about what age they are - you can't really pin them down.
"The Doctors are all the same Doctor really, at the end of the day, but you can slide the faders up and down....
"Typically, Matt's method would do that, too: occasionally just turn cold and you'd think, 'You're not really a puppy are you?' Just like Peter Capaldi's Doctor will sometimes remind me he's a big kid at heart."
Cold Feet star Hermione Norris, Ben Miller, Tom Riley and Keeley Hawes are joining Doctor Who this year, with the show heading for Lanzarote.
Moffat said that writing the 50th anniversary episode of Doctor Who was "terrifying", adding: "I can remember sitting with my wife saying, 'I can't tell if it's good any more, it could be rubbish - I'll have to leave the country. I'll have to fake my own death.'"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article