RSNO
RSNO
Glasgow Royal Concert Hall
Michael Tumelty
WELL, ladies and gentlemen; I'm sorry to say this, especially if you enjoyed it, but that Shostakovich Ten on Saturday night from the baton of Dutch conductor Lawrence Renes did absolutely nothing for me. It's a fascinating phenomenon, when a performance leaves you cold. The RSNO played well, and intensively, under leader Jim Clark. All the right notes and gestures were there. All the shapes and structures were appropriately configured. Tempos were occasionally debatable. But, for this listener, nothing, absolutely nothing, came off the page. It was like music by numbers. The first movement should drag you into its fathomless depths, then shatter you with its inexorable climax. The four-minute, abrasive Scherzo from Hell should pin you to the wall with its sheer ferocity; and so on, right through to Shostakovich beating you about the brains with the hammering reiterations of his obsessive motto theme in the finale. This was polite. It was civilised. It was correct. It wore a suit. The symphony is about Shostakovich finally sticking the boot into Stalin, for God's sake. I'm an open wound to this music. I felt nothing. Renes neglected the spirit of the music and it failed to ignite.
At least the first half was more fun, with Shostakovich's Suite for Variety Stage Orchestra and Terrence Wilson's rather posh version of Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue, though that was a bit low-fat and lacked flamboyance, even if Wilson's madcap version of Mozart's Turkish Rondo made up for it in sheer hilarity. But oh, that dire, pedestrian vision of the great Tenth Symphony. It's all very well to have the right notes: the music within them has to be released.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article