Neel Mukherjee's debut novel, A Life Apart, was set in England.
For his second, the London-based Indian returns to his home city of Calcutta for a sprawling saga taking in the lives of three generations of the Ghosh family. Beginning in 1967, it works forward to 1970, though as the stories of the various family members unspool there are frequent flashbacks to other eras.
Intercutting this are entries from a journal-cum-confession written by 21-year-old Supratik Ghosh, who has walked away from his comfortable middle-class life to join a group of Maoist revolutionaries.
The intended recipient of this document, another family member, remains unnamed, though there are clues enough for the reader to work it out.
Supratik's narrative and his journey - he leaves, foments revolution, kills class traitors, then returns to the city - serve as a neat framing device. But it's the ups and downs of life in the Ghosh household, a massive house in south Calcutta, that drive the story. This is a world where everybody plays the long game, where power shifts incrementally through alliance and appeasement, where coded (and not-so-coded) insults are traded at dinner, and face is everything. Or almost everything: jewellery and saris count for a lot too.
Queen of the poisonous put-down is Chhaya, only daughter of ailing Ghosh patriarch Prafullanath and his domineering wife Charabula. Chhaya has compounded the sin of being born dark-skinned and ugly by becoming highly educated and (worst of all) remaining unmarried, though any sympathies we have for her dissipate as the story progresses.
Among her four brothers she's closest to Priyonath - so close that she tries to commit suicide after he weds.
Meanwhile his visits to a prostitute who covers him in newspaper, squats on his chest and defecates for his masturbatory pleasure are a direct result of a vivid childhood memory: walking in on Chhaya on the toilet. She let him watch. Nothing was said. But something in the experience touched his dawning sexuality and fused with it. Such is life, Mukherjee seems to tells us. Everyone has their thing.
The other brothers are Adinath, Bholanath and Somnath. Adinath, the oldest and father of Supratik, wanted to be an engineer and build houses rather than go into the family business, which is paper, so now he drinks.
Somnath, the youngest, was spoilt as a child and became so "irrepressibly priapic" as a man that he's dead by the age of 24, his head bashed to "clotted black jam" after trying to rape a girl. There are wives and children and servants too, and we meet them all across the novel's 500-odd pages, entering their lives to taste their hopes, fears and disappointments.
With a narrative so deeply rooted in Bengali culture and the Indian politics of the first half of the 20th century, Mukherjee (or his publishers) have appended several pages of instruction.
It starts with a family tree - there are 17 members of the Ghosh family - and continues with a map of West Bengal, and offers a page on the complicated relational terms that are used in place of proper names. Even with these notes it isn't always easy to know who's being referred to.
Finally, there's a glossary, running from A for Aanchol (the bit of the sari which hangs over the shoulder) to U for Uff ("most commonly an expression of irritation").
The reader may also want to brush up on the Naxalite movement, a Communist insurgency born in the late 1960s and still active in parts of India today.
The phrase that gives the novel its title is woven into a moment in Supratik's narrative, but it features more prominently in one of the four epigraphs the author selects, a line from James Salter's Light Years: "How can we imagine what our lives should be without the illumination of the lives of others?"
Mukherkee's novel is a colourful mosaic of these lives, human experiences which are both unique and universal - proof, if you like, that what we do and feel has been done and felt before, and will be again. Is there solace in that? Some. Maybe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article