Hamlet
Hamlet
Tron, Glasgow
Marianne Gunn
IF something is rotten in the state of Denmark, then there is a definite intrigue with that issue for theatre companies in Scotland this particular season. The Royal Conservatoire's Hamlet is the first of three to be performed in Glasgow over the summer with an al fresco Hamlet in July (from Bard in the Botanics) and a further offering from the Citizens Theatre, opening the day after the Scottish independence referendum.
Arguably Shakespeare's most culturally penetrating play, with much of his clever wordplay still in common usage, the Conservatoire's examination of reason or madness is heightened by the fact Hamlet is performed by three actors from the BA Acting programme.
Andreas Munoz, Francesca Tomlinson and Rhys Warrington bring different aspects of the Prince's character alive: Munoz oozes a brooding physicality, Tomlinson offers deep thinking combined with probing questioning, and Warrington throws in some cheeky playfulness. This works best in the soliloquies but also proves effective when the trio speak in unison (although this is sometimes hampered by differences in diction and delivery).
The conceit, which works well for the character of Hamlet, is less successful for the dual-roled Ophelia (Tania Van Amse and Emma Read). The directors, Hugh Hodgart and Katya Kamotskaia, concede the casting is "to more equitably share the opportunity" which is an altogether understandable impulse to best showcase the final year students.
Martin Donaghy's Claudius is suitably calculating with an undercurrent of menace while Adam Newington's Laertes is most memorable for his beautiful timbre. A final nod to Meghan Tyler for providing some much-needed light relief as the jocular Gravedigger. But it would be good to see more light and shade in the next two productions of this revenge tragedy, please.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article