Fejes Quartet
Fejes Quartet
Cottier's Theatre, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Mike Lloyd, violist in Tamas Fejes's String Quartet, hit the nail on the head, twice, in his brief introduction to the group's performances at Cottier's Theatre on Monday night.
The first strike, which was typically oblique, outlined the difficulties being experienced by Mozart at the time he was writing his 23rd and last string quartet, K590: his health, his wife's health and his penury.
Yet, despite these vicissitudes, as the Fejes Quartet demonstrated, that quartet is a masterpiece of fluency, character and consummate fluidity, with Mozart, whatever else was going on in his short life, clearly transcending the limitations of his circumstances, all reflected, I felt, in the Fejes' fine performance.
And Lloyd's second strike at the nail-head was when he referred to the "magnificence" of Shostakovich's Second String Quartet, meaning its scope and scale, and its near-symphonic dimensions.
That rarely-played quartet, which received a riveting performance by the Fejes group, is light years from the first quartet, which opened the Currie and Quirk-sponsored series on Saturday.
But Shostakovich, by this time, near the mid-1940s, already had eight of his symphonies under his belt and a complete command of his idiom.
So, whereas the music might have been one of his veiled attacks on Stalinism, the Second Quartet, saturated with Jewish and klezmer influences, rails overtly against anti-semitism; and all these elements, explicitly-characterised in a compelling Fejes account of the piece, resulted in a grippingly-focused and unremittingly intense performance, particularly in its impassioned Jewish accent and the great slashing chord sequences of the finale, which just pinned you to the wall.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article