Daniel's Beard
Daniel's Beard
Cottier's Theatre, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
WHAT a night, with back-to-back concerts at 6.30pm and 8.30pm, at the first of which violinist Catherine Manson and pianist Alasdair Beatson rounded off their selection of Beethoven Violin Sonatas with a mind-blowing performance of the monumental Kreutzer Sonata ("the almighty" Kreutzer, Manson called it). Can we have these two back, please?
Then, at 8.30pm, the string quartet of host ensemble, Daniel's Beard (violinists Alistair Savage and Elita Poulter, violist Scott Dickinson and cellist Tom Rathbone), followed a buoyant and profound account of Haydn's Lark Quartet with a devastating performance of Shostakovich's Third String Quartet, a masterwork packed with wit, sarcasm and racy humour, shattering seriousness and humbling profundity, played with intense concentration and emotional depth by the quartet in a performance which had a point to make.
This is a three-year series, in which the 15 String Quartets will be played numerically. It started last Saturday, and on Wednesday reached the Third Quartet. Now this sounds like a composer moving into a new medium. But at each of the three concerts to date, the Cottier Chamber Project has taken pains, through its programme notes and introductions by the players, to point out that the numbers are deceptive: by the time he started writing string quartets, Shostakovich already had loads of his symphonies under his belt, was a consummate craftsman, and a master in the stealthy art of expressive deception in the face of totalitarian control. And that resonated throughout this gripping performance of the Third Quartet. Further, this emerging point was perhaps not made clear enough in the last cycle done in Glasgow, which was with the Brodsky Quartet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article