The opening ceremony of the Commonwealth Games had John Barrowman, the closing one had Kylie Minogue in thigh-high boots and a basque, which made the last night camper than the first, although only just.
It was simpler too, which was a relief for those who thought the opening ceremony clunky. Hampden also benefited from the lack of the anxiety you could feel in Celtic Park 11 days ago about whether it would all be any good. Last night, there was a more confident feeling: the idea was for Glasgow to party.
Sadly, no one had told the Games and council officials, whose speeches did a pretty good job of killing the atmosphere. Thankfully, it was rescued by Kylie, who had the worst warm-up act of her career: the Earl of Wessex.
On the whole, the performances were better than the ones at Celtic Park though: there was Lulu, Deacon Blue and a bin lorry which did its loop of the stadium without a hitch. But like the opening ceremony, the event on television seemed to be less impressive than the one in the stadium. All the way through, friends were texting from Hampden telling me how good the atmosphere was, but on TV the cameras, too often, went too close up and you could see the joins. TV cameras can't pick up warmth and atmosphere - you need to go out on the streets to feel that.
Things did loosen up towards the end, as they do on a night-out in Glasgow, although the fact that the athletes were left to mill about on the pitch highlighted a problem with both ceremonies: the weird lack of sport.
And again: where was contemporary Scotland? Perhaps, at the sight of old Scotland, military Scotland and especially cheesy Scotland, it decided to stay at home.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article