Music
The Maccabees, O2 ABC, Glasgow
Lisa-Marie Ferla
Three stars
The use of a telephone ring as rhythm section on one of the Maccabees' new songs is a clever choice.
I read once that the UK telephone ringing pattern was designed to be just arhythmic enough that the human brain couldn't tune it out. In a sense, then, it's like the London five-piece: there's something slightly off about them, something that stops the listener from writing them off as a run-of-the-mill guitar band.
Part of that is down to the vocals of frontman Orlando Weeks: his otherworldly wail adds a touch of the dramatic to "Wall of Arms" and the newer songs in the set; and warps the jingly, jangly melodies of early material like "Latchmere" and "Precious Time" enough to keep it interesting. "Young Lions" and "Love You Better" edge closer to generic festival fayre, but their big choruses and brass band-like synthesisers get the crowd going.
You get the impression that the Maccabees see themselves more as an Arcade Fire than a Kasabian: their approach hints at a sense of the grandiose in ambition, if not entirely in execution, while Weeks howls like a man possessed on the newer songs. New single "Marks to Prove" is decidedly popper in nature - but, with its slowed down bridge and strange Halloween-esque sound effects, the band's apparent desire to warp the mundane remains.
The road from novelty songs about wave machines to atmospheric stadium rock is a treacherous one, but there seems to be every indication that the Maccabees could pull it off. Given that, three years from their last release, there's almost enough in the set to piece a new album together it won't be long until we find out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article