Music
Ilya Gringolts/Fali Pavri, RCS, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four stars
I WOULD not normally use the word “captivating” about Shostakovich’s 1968 Violin Sonata. Superficially it feels like an inappropriate description, unsuitable from almost any perspective. Yet, in an odd way, it exactly suited the nature and effect of the performance of the Sonata given on Friday in the Royal Conservatoire by Ilya Gringolts, International Fellow of Violin and Fali Pavri, a professor of piano in the Conservatoire.
The long, opening, un-harmonised melody on piano drew one in. When Gringolts added his voice, the music developed an aura of brooding soulfulness, shrouded with a sense of restraint. Nothing was overstated in the performance, which in fact seemed to increase the intensity of the music. I felt as though I had been sucked into the heart of the piece. Only when I felt my own heart pounding did I realise I was actually holding my breath. In that performance these two players had this listener by the throat. And that terse, ticking quality at the end of the movement, which just stops, although a familiar device in the composer’s armoury, is a bit scary when as effectively delivered as here.
The stomping, Scherzo-like quality of the second movement came as a release and a relief, though there are moments where you can feel Shostakovich is using you as a punch-bag. An extremely powerful performance by Gringolts and Pavri; and there was absolutely no letting-up in tension for their performance of Galina Ustvolskaya’s Duet, with its Psycho shrieks, violent, convulsive contrasts, and, at one point, a boiling sense of anger. I get the point of this music, but I do not like it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here