DOCTOR Who producer Steven Moffat says the women in the series are not like the one-dimensional characters often portrayed in James Bond films.
After the departure of the Doctor’s companion Clara Oswald (Jenna Coleman), who is leaving the series after three years, the Scots-born TV executive was keen to emphasize the impact this will have on the Time Lord, currently played by Peter Capaldi.
Moffat, who grew up in Paisley, said: “We have an emotionally engaged hero and the women he knows are not like James Bond girls. They don’t just disappear between movies. When the Doctor ends a friendship, it tears him apart.”
Moffat has been accused of misogyny by a newspaper and online forums, who dislike the roles he has written for female characters such as River Song, Amy Pond and Clara. Critics say he writes women who cannot exist without a male presence to guide them.
Addressing these concerns, he said: “It’s a complicated issue. I never quite know how to respond. The general point being made by these people is correct. We need better female role models on screen.
“Maybe this is my dimwittery but I do not understand why Doctor Who of all shows is singled out as misogynist. I’m sure I’m to the left of a lot of my detractors.”
Having killed off Clara’s character in a recently screened episode, Moffat was reluctant to be drawn on his plans for a successor, only saying: “A new companion gives us the chance to relaunch the show. And we’ve got a really cool new idea about how to do that.”
It is the latest defence that Moffat has issued of his depiction of women during his seven year stint in charge of the show.
Earlier this year, he said: “These are strong women. If anyone needs rescuing, it’s the Doctor. As for “macho” – Matt Smith, David Tennant? Really?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here