A Hologram for the King (12A)
four stars
Dir: Tom Tykwer
With: Tom Hanks, Alexander Black, Sarita Choudhury
Runtime: 98 minutes
TOM Hanks is often labelled the Everyman of actors, able to portray ordinary mortals with ease. That hardly does credit to the man’s extraordinary abilities. Hanks is arguably the last great movie star, someone who does not simply draw audiences into the cinema on the strength of his name alone, but an actor who can take folk to strange and wonderful places they may not have dreamed of visiting, and leave them glad they came along for the ride.
A Hologram for the King is such an oddball odyssey. Like Cloud Atlas, the other adaptation of a Dave Eggers novel in which Hanks starred, it is one of Hanks’s walks on the wild side. While not as bizarre as Cloud Atlas with its time and space hopping, A Hologram for the King is an unsettling piece, but enjoyably so. This is a film by and for grown ups who know that life does not make much sense at times, and when that happens the only thing to do is hang on and hope that the dust, or in the case of A Hologram for the King, the sand, settles soon.
Hanks plays Alan Clay, to whom we are introduced via a blast of Once in a Lifetime by Talking Heads. Once upon a time, Alan had ticked the boxes for a beautiful house, beautiful wife, wonderful daughter, large automobile and all that, but no longer. As a result of divorce such things have gone, and now he is just another late middle-aged, failed executive back on the road and feeling every minute of it in his bones.
Courtesy of a supposed contact he has with a Saudi prince, Alan has been hired to go over to the desert kingdom and pitch the idea of special software that allows business people to “meet” via holograms. No more need for busy bees to go travelling, or indulge in any of that messy person to person stuff; just beam them up, Scotty, and let’s do a deal.
Twyker (who also directed Hanks in Cloud Atlas and whose other pictures include Perfume, Run Lola Run) is on screenplay and directing duties. He and Hanks do a terrific job of hurling Alan into a bewildering world, one that feels immediately alien, and not just because of the jet lag. Saudi Arabia is shown as a place of extremes, where the cutting edge of modernism grates against ancient conventions and the strictest of rules. Alan appears to be in some kind of no man’s land, where nothing makes sense and he, with his American efficiency and hail fellow well met approach, cannot get the most simplest things (arranging a meeting, organising wi-fi) done. Besides the jet lag, he is still fighting his way through the grief of a divorce. He misses his college student daughter. He misses boring old normality.
Fortunately, Alan has a guide by his side in the shape of a taxi driver named Yousef (played by Alexander Black). In western society, Yousef would be called a slacker, a no hoper, yet it is he who helps Alan make sense of often bewildering customs and events. Besides Yousef, Alan meets a local doctor, Zahra (Sarita Choudhury) and a fellow corporate soldier played by Sidse Babett Knudsen of Borgen fame. Will he ever get that promised meeting with the king, or will that turn out, like so many other things, to be a mirage?
A Hologram for the King takes its cue from Alan and Yousef in being funny, wise, and gentle. It bumbles along, not something which will be to everyone’s taste, but for many this will be part of the picture’s charm. Above all there is Hanks. What fascinating choices he is making as his career advances, what chances he is taking with material. The actor who made his name nearly three decades ago playing a kid trapped in an adult body in Big just gets better and better with age
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here