Opera
The Marriage of Figaro
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
three stars
ESPECIALLY after the bold stagings of Norma and Cosi fan tutte that visited the Edinburgh International Festival this summer, there is no denying that this revival of Sir Thomas Allen's 2010 production of the first of the Mozart/Da Ponte collaborations looks a conservative affair, however clever Simon Higlett's sumptuous designs. So it was bracing to hear the Orchestra of Scottish Opera begin proceedings with a strikingly crisp – and brisk – account of the familiar overture. The musicians, under Swedish conductor Tobias Ringborg, emerge from the evening with the great credit, even if elements of the staging, and in particular the sometimes staid blocking of the principals, conspire to slow the pace over a long evening.
ITV's Downton Abbey first screened a month before this production premiered and something akin to the Downton effect appears to have afflicted this revival. It is perhaps most obvious in the dominance of the female characters, with Ben McAteer's Figaro a bit of a stuffed shirt never as in control as he believes and Samuel Dale Johnson's Count Almaviva most animated when he is on the back foot. Marie McLaughlin's lively Marcellina owes a little to Dame Maggie Smith and is more of a match than is often the case for Susanna (Anna Devin), the role McLaughlin played for Scottish Opera an incredible 36 years ago. She is vocally on fine form too, although the honours go to Devin, whose natural relaxed path through the score is exemplary.
The ensemble singing, a greater delight than the few famous arias, is beautifully balanced – notably the Act III sextet – but this Figaro is ultimately more silly than sexy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here