Music
Kiefer Sutherland
O2ABC, Glasgow
Graeme Virtue
four stars
IN A screen career spanning over three decades, Kiefer Sutherland has played a lot of different characters. On stage at the ABC, he seems to be relishing his latest role: a grizzled, grinning 50-year-old country singer touring the UK in support of a pretty good debut album.
The former Young Gun and CTU troubleshooter certainly looks the part in worn jeans, neck rag and white gaucho hat. Crucially, Sutherland sounds convincing too. His vocal delivery – a variant of Jack Bauer’s urgent, commanding rasp familiar from dozens of hectic interrogations on 24 – is a pleasing fit for the hardscrabble songs of heartbreak and hard liquor that feature on his Down In A Hole record.
During the mid-1990s, Sutherland worked the rodeo circuit, so his bronco-busting posturing doesn’t feel too much like an affectation. Similarly, his well-documented hell-raising adds some heft to the sozzled waltz of Not Enough Whiskey and the road house boogie of Ways to be Wicked. A rowdy, raucous four-piece backing band allow Sutherland to focus on being a frontman, geeing up the sold-out crowd with well-timed air punches during songs and wrangling them with pleasingly off-colour anecdotes in between. It helps that his songs are immediate enough to grab even those who may have only come to gawk at a Hollywood star off the reservation, and that he interleaves them with some well-chosen Merle Haggard, Tom Petty and Bob Dylan covers.
Midway through the first of two encores, the audience burst into a spontaneous, five-minute long ovation and if Sutherland’s slightly dazed, moist-eyed reaction to all the emphatic hollering is an act, it’s a damn good one.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here