Dr Jekyll and Mr Seek
Anthony O’Neill
Black & White, £8.99
Review by Alastair Mabbott
THERE appears to be no end in sight to the outpouring of sequels or prequels to literary classics. Alexandra Ripley’s Scarlett (Gone With The Wind), Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea (Jane Eyre), P.D. James’s Death Comes to Pemberley (Pride and Prejudice) and Francois Ceresa’s Cosette (Les Miserables) are just a few of the best-known examples from this flourishing branch of publishing.
Into this crowded market comes Dr Jekyll and Mr Seek (“If he be Mr Hyde, I shall be Mr Seek,” exclaimed Jekyll’s lawyer Gabriel Utterson in the Robert Louis Stevenson original), by Anthony O’Neill, originally from Melbourne but now resident in RLS’s home city of Edinburgh, where the book makes a brief detour in its second half.
It takes place seven years after the events of the original. Gabriel Utterson, named in Jekyll’s will as his beneficiary, is set to inherit the scientist’s London townhouse, the required time since Jekyll’s disappearance and presumed death having elapsed. With less than a week to go before the house becomes legally his, he finds it has been occupied by a man who claims to be Henry Jekyll, returned from a long sojourn abroad, during which he suffered from amnesia.
Only Utterson knows that this interloper cannot be Henry Jekyll, because only he is aware that Jekyll and the deceased Mr Hyde were the same person. He has kept Jekyll’s secret, and his confessional manuscript, to himself. To prove that this man is an imposter he would not only have to betray the confidence of his late friend but attempt to convince London society with a scarcely believable tale of a potion which can transform a man into his unfettered, libidinous shadow self. The fact that Utterson stands to gain a desirable townhouse if Jekyll remains missing undermines what slender credibility he might have.
But when Utterson finally meets the pretender, he too is struck by the perfect resemblance to his old friend, and his case against the imposter, despite some suspicious deaths, begins to unravel. Were the events of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde a mere hallucination on Utterson’s part? Ah, but what of the manuscript, written in Jekyll’s own hand, that confessed all? Yes, what of it? Did it ever actually exist outside of Utterson’s mind?
O’Neill’s prose retains much of RLS’s tone, but his is a somewhat less flowery rendition, pared back to the storytelling essentials and more suited to present-day tastes. It’s short and to the point, moves like the clappers and can be read in an afternoon. He takes the original, which dwelt on the duality of man, and flips it sideways, focusing this sequel on the contemporary concern of identity theft while deconstructing and casting doubt on the events of the original. Reimagined in this way, it seems as much like a companion piece as a sequel, and one feels that master storyteller RLS would have smiled with guarded approval at the direction O’Neill had taken his ideas.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here