Fringe Dance & Physical Theatre
8 Songs
Assembly Roxy
*****
What The Moon Saw
Zoo Southside
****
Mary Brennan
GOOD, good vibrations - with the audience picking up excitations as the six-strong company, all members of Gandini Juggling, respond to the Beach Boys’ harmonies with witty visual patternings of their own.
Volleys of little white balls - soaring and bopping along with the vocals - are just the beginning. In the course of 8 Songs, the team will ally their astutely co-ordinated juggling skills to hip shimmies, dancey footwork - even balletic leaps - when Dylan insists I Want You or the The Rolling Stones invoke Sympathy for the Devil.
Inbetweentimes, individuals voice the lyrics in a quirky variety of styles - Chris Patfield orates the Stones’ track as if it were Shakespeare, other texts benefit from a humorously deadpan approach. The ensemble’s response to Bowie’s Scary Monsters is a tour-de-force of complex ball-passing, cod-spooky mime and tongue-in-cheek boogie-ings. If these were your Desert Island Discs, you’d want the Gandinis, juggling, as your castaway luxury.
Urban cool? Insights into masculinity and identity? 2Faced Dance have previously nailed that. The charmingly whimsical What the Moon Saw is their first children’s show.
Young Jack (Sam Buswell) can’t get to sleep. But darkness seems to make everything in his bedroom look monochrome. He wants the colour to come back, so the Man in the Moon - aerial artist Sean Moss, inside an overhead hoop - spins up a fantastical midnight adventure where dance and circus skills are intrinsic to the story-telling.
There’s an engaging, larky energy to Buswell’s Jack the lad, while Louis Parker-Evans (in various eccentric guises) matches him across an exhilarating range of movement styles. The metal-work set takes the action off-the-floor (and off-the-wall) - by the end, the ‘house’ outline is all lit up and delighted tinies are on-stage doing colouring in.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here