Dir: Lone Scherfig
With: Gemma Arterton, Sam Claflin, Bill Nighy
Runtime: 117 minutes
THERE are certain actors whose arrival on a cinema screen prompts a palpable reaction in audiences. You can almost hear the sighs of relief and see shoulders relax as the collective thought ripples through the stalls like a mental Mexican wave. “Well, whatever this carry on turns out to be,” the hive mind buzzes, “the evening won’t be completely wasted now that X has turned up.”
I’ve seen Denzel Washington do it many times in the US, ditto Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep. In Scotland, it’s James McAvoy who has national cinema treasure status. But for the UK as a whole, it would be hard to beat Bill Nighy (a half stake in whom Scotland can claim since his mother, a nurse, was from Glasgow). True to form, the louche, dapper and leonine star of The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel is the best thing in Lone Scherfig’s congenial wartime comedy drama Their Finest.
Gemma Arterton plays Catrin Cole, a young woman living in 1940 London who is taken on by the Ministry of Information as a film writer. As the war starts to hit hard on the home front, the Ministry is called upon to crank out ever more cheerful and spirit-lifting films. The immediate task for Cole’s unit, led by arrogant young director Tom Buckley (Sam Claflin), is to make a feature film about the Dunkirk landings that will show Britain in the pluckiest possible light.
Cole picks up on a local paper story about two sisters being among the many who ventured out in small boats across the Channel to evacuate British soldiers. Thinking this would make the perfect plot, she interviews the pair, only to discover the story is not as straightforward as it seems. But hey ho, this is the motion picture business. Films, Buckley tells her, are just “real life with the boring bits cut out”, the boring bit in this instance being large chunks of the truth.
As if heeding Buckley’s words, Scherfig, the director of An Education and One Day, wastes no time in cracking on with the jolliest part of the story – the making of the film itself. It is here we meet the magnificent Ambrose Hilliard (Nighy), a thespian so hammy he could feed a small town for a month. Ageing, spectacularly vain and acutely aware of his diminishing status in a business that is never kind to sensitive souls, Ambrose is part monster, part angel: a funny, warm delight when he wants to be, a whiny nightmare when unhappy.
Scherfig, adapting Lissa Evans’s novel Their Finest Hour and a Half, has a ball recreating the shoot, with the cast taking their cue from her. There are few enterprises more ridiculous than filmmaking, which is essentially adults playing at dress-up in front of cameras, and Their Finest has plenty of good-natured, loving jokes at the profession’s expense. But we also see that film, much like war but without the casualties, is a communal event, a family affair, where every sinew is strained to the same end.
The film hits the odd sticky patch when it seems to suddenly remember that war is not a funny business at all. It is understandable why it should do so, but the effect on the tone can be jarring. One minute we are deep in a Dad’s Army style caper, chuckling away at the daft humour, the next we are pulled up short by tragic reality. There is also a love triangle going on, which adds to the all-over-the-shop tone.
If you can put that to one side, there is a lot to enjoy in Scherfig’s piece. Its love of film as an epically silly but life-enhancing endeavour, and its affection for the characters, shine through. Nighy is terrific, but then you expect that. But closely following him is Arterton, playing the woman taken on to write “the slop” – the gooey, lovey-dovey material – but who turns out to have so much more to offer. Like character, like actor, Arterton is rapidly advancing towards national treasure status in her own right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here