FOUR STARS
THERE is nothing like the Cottier Chamber Project, which rolled out its annual stall at the weekend. And what I mean by “nothing like” was enshrined in the first 8.30pm concert of the festival on Friday night.
Even if the group of the night, the string quartet of parent ensemble, Daniel’s Beard, didn’t have Cottier’s Theatre itself as its platform, it brought its collective persona and brio into the university’s Concert Hall, which can be a soul-less place, and ignited its atmosphere with their group dynamic. There is a feeling to Cottier events that is utterly different to formal chamber music recitals.
I tend to use the word “spontaneous”.
That’s wrong, of course, but there is a strong feeling that the musicians are there because they want to be there, and they are playing their music because they want the opportunity to so, not because it happens to be on someone’s schedule.
The atmosphere, I imagine, is redolent of Schubert’s famous music-making evenings, fuelled today by wine, conversation, good humour, and the inimitable immediacy of live music.
And that was reflected throughout the performances by violinists Alastair Savage and Alice Rickards, violist Andrew Berridge (all BBC SSO players) along with freelance cellist Sonia Cromarty, whose sizzling, questing and probing account of Shostakovich’s 11th String Quartet, with the composer feeling his way towards something new, was as cogent and compact as a series of incisive aphorisms.
And it was perfectly counterbalanced by the group’s dramatic, broad unfolding of Schubert’s Death and the Maiden Quartet, whose finale was hair-raisingly fast, though staying on the rails.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here