Festival Music
Had We Never
Scottish National Portrait Gallery
Hazel Rowland
three stars
PUTTING on an event in the Scottish National Portrait Gallery’s Great Hall must have seemed like a good idea. Not only is the room beautiful, its limited capacity creates an intimate atmosphere. Yet its layout caused problems with Douglas Gordon’s installation, Black Burns, dividing audience and performers, creating a distance difficult to communicate across.
This proved problematic for a concert that centred around the poetry of Robert Burns, where grasping the words is paramount. Countertenor David James opened from the balcony singing he Slave’s Lament. Being unable to see where his voice was coming from produced a haunting effect, but it was also difficult to distinguish his words. Perhaps Brian Bannatyne-Scott’s wonderfully resonant voice made him more adept at projecting to the audience in Ae fond kiss, yet the programme notes did not display the Russian words next to their English translation for Shostakovich’s settings of two poems by Burns (which had been translated into Russian for his setting). Without the Russian, we could not follow precisely what Bannatyne-Scott was singing, though his rich low notes remained a treat nonetheless.
The three members of the Scottish Ensemble had more success in communicating to the audience when they joined reggae singer Ghetto Priest for Sally Beamish’s new version of The Slave’s Lament. Although Beamish writes simple, long-held notes, they were completely enrapturing. Responding to Priest’s singing, the performance became an overt demonstration of how music’s emotional power can surpass that of words.
That the audience were asked not to clap between pieces indicated that Had We Never was conceived as a single entity but the connections between the pieces needed greater consideration if this intriguing concoction of music and poetry was going to reach its lofty ambitions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here