Music
Iestyn Davies and Academy of Ancient Music
Queen’s Hall
Svend McEwan-Brown
five stars
J S BACH eclipses most of his contemporaries, but perhaps Georg Philip Telemann has more right than most to feel aggrieved about it. Prolific and acclaimed in life, his neglect since death is proof that posterity just isn’t fair. 2017 is the 250th anniversary of that death, so it was good to hear The Academy of Ancient Music pair the two men, giving Telemann the most time. Did it tilt the scales in his favour? Yes and no. The inexhaustible inventiveness of both is awe-inspiring. Telemann’s earthy Overture-Suite TWV55:D15 is pure enjoyment, a lovely sequence of dances that AAM played with zest. Great to hear the wonderfully woody baroque winds pitched against the strings. Sadly, his trio sonata was way less memorable. It had the misfortune to be followed by Bach’s Cantata BWV169: from the first solo violin flourish, Bach has your ear in a way Telemann simply does not.
Bach wrote astounding music for the alto voice: remarkably compelling and remarkably difficult. He must have known some amazing singers. The two cantatas here tested Iestyn Davies to the full: the first (BWV54), demanded a stentorian lower register to project every joyless note of its fire and brimstone sermon against sin (apt in this former church); the second (BWV169) ranged widely, right up to sweet top notes. Davies handled both superbly. His voice is all you could hope for: plangent, expressive, agile and evenly produced throughout. The utter highlight of the morning was an astonishing aria, Stirb in mir from BWV 169. Bach sets a verse longing for freedom from earthly desires to mesmerising, long vocal lines over disarming harmonies, so phrases turn and twist to arrive in unexpected places. Davies’ phrasing, legato – and breath control – were outstanding.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here