Festival Music
Trio Zimmermann
Queen's Hall
Keith Bruce
four stars
WELL, that was welcome and bracing. After a surfeit of gut strings and gigues from early music specialists, Schoenberg's Opus 45 String Trio came as a breath of sharp, fresh modernist air. Not that it was labelled as such, but there was also a valid 70th birthday reason for its inclusion in a morning recital, as it dates, like the Festival itself, from 1947. Arguably a little more of the same compositional vintage in the 2017 programme might have balanced things up a bit.
It is a bow-shredding piece at the start – and violinist Frank Peter Zimmermann and viola-player Antoine Tamestit were soon shedding horse-hair to prove it – but also has its mellow moments, with delicate harmonics and muted strings – and if there is little that mainstream taste would identify as "melodic", the use Schoenberg makes if his material, in something that requires virtuoso technique, is fascinating.
So too, and as technically demanding, is Dmitry Sitkovetsky's arrangement of Bach's Goldberg Variations. Given the status of Bach's Partitas and Sonatas as solo showpieces for string players, the idea seems almost obvious, but this was the first time I have heard the epic 80-minute 1985 work. In a sense it is a relay, with the musical baton being constantly passed between Zimmermann, Tamestit, and cellist Christian Poltera, a former BBC New Generation with a superb sound and articulation. Sitkovetsky uses every conceivable combination of the three instruments along the way, and it is a marathon as well, obviously. These athletes paced themselves beautifully, with plenty of vim left for the demanding breath-catching speedy fingerwork required at the sprint to the tape.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here