Music
Edinburgh Quartet
Queen’s Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce, four stars
THE change in personnel for this concert may have been forced upon the group, with Tom Hankey leading and the Berkeley Ensemble’s leader, Sophie Mather, coming in as second violin, but from the first bars of Mozart’s G Major Quartet No 14, the balance of the instruments here was really quite special.
It is tempting to give a deal of the credit for this to the newcomer, whose tone partnered Hankey’s quite beautifully, but of course she was only a quarter of the sound in a programme that gave both cellist Mark Bailey and, to a lesser degree, Catherine Marwood’s viola their own time in the spotlight.
The Mozart was really the anomaly in the recital, which is repeated at Glasgow City Halls on Thursday evening, completing the group’s “points of the compass” sequence of concerts. Vienna is due South of some places (Gdansk?), but it is difficult to hear this work of the composer’s early maturity as “southern”. The second movement is quintessential Mozart, and the canonical finale – on which the dynamic attack was led by Bailey’s cello – is full of joie de vivre and fun.
The cellist was also to the fore in the Quartet No.6 by Brazilian Villa-Lobos, which did justify the concert’s billing. The instrument states the second movement theme to pizzicato accompaniment, and is again in a leading role in the muted third, very much the heart of the work, in which pole position is passed around every instrument. If it is rather French-sounding, the rest of the work is identifiably American, with a particular debt to Copland in places.
Less than a century previously, Verdi wrote his sole string quartet, and it is every bit as dramatic as you would expect. There is a whole garden scene of confused lovers in the second movement Andante, followed by two pacey showpieces that show the composer to be a master of the form, had he not been tied up with all that opera-writing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here