Music
BBC SSO/Dausgaard
City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four Stars
THURSDAY night’s BBC SSO concert was a critical event for the orchestra. It was the first official concert in Glasgow where the SSO’s new chief conductor, Dane Thomas Dausgaard, was on display with his own band. In advance of the evening, it felt momentous, however it might turn out. And my own feeling about Dausgaard was that I remained to be persuaded.
At the end of a long concert with two works and no interval, things, for me, had moved on. Dausgaard did a good job with Helen Grime’s splendid Catterline in Winter, the first of two Joan Eardley pictures, bringing the music vividly off the page, with the SSO projecting well the music’s restless dramatic undertow, as well as its surface earthiness, full of slippery contours: a very impressive piece, convincingly-delivered by the orchestra and its new boss. Part Two follows in December.
But the wide-screen performance of the night was Bruckner’s Ninth Symphony, given in a new edition with a proposed fourth movement finale created by a team of composers, musicologists and so on: the composer died before writing a finale, though he left bits and clues. I loved the performance of the first three movements. The band played massively and sonorously for their new skipper, while Dausgaard himself, though I find his style odd to watch, directed it like a proper symphony, full of forward movement, always pressing on and, bless his Danish socks, not letting the music assemble laboriously into one of those cathedrals in sound so beloved of Brucknerians. The new finale, I thought, was a failure; more of that another time.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article