Dance
Matthew Bourne’s Cinderella
Festival Theatre, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan, five stars
Sirens shrill out. The London Blitz is loudly exploding. And the opening notes of Prokofiev’s Cinderella (composed between 1940 and 1944) have rarely sounded more haunted, or yearningly wistful. It’s against this backdrop of skies randomly raining down death that Matthew Bourne’s Cinderella finds love – but with no guarantees that she and her pilot, Harry, will live happily ever after.
Bourne has fine-tuned his 1997 version of the familiar fairy-tale but the concept hasn’t altered: namely the healing power of love in the darkest of uncertain times. Ashley Shaw’s dutifully-drudging Cinders – now hassled by three oddball step-brothers alongside two seriously vain step-sisters and a total lush of a step-mother – takes refuge in romantic dreams of a dashing RAF pilot (Andrew Monaghan). In reality, he’s suffering from traumatic stress. Luckily – and this is where Bourne’s affection for old movies wittily informs the action – an Angel appears and brings these two wounded souls together.
Liam Mower’s white-suited Angel is a gloriously balletic force of divine intervention, a gleaming-luminous figure in designer Lez Brotherston’s appropriately grey-scale vistas where fiery red only erupts during cataclysmic air-raids.
Bourne’s Londoners, however, still face the music and dance: cunningly choreographed jivings, lindy-hoppings and similar 40’s styles are deliciously in step with Prokofiev’s music while – in the heady swing and sway at the Cafe de Paris – there are echoes of Fred and Ginger (themselves recalling Vernon and Irene Castle) in the waltz that brings Cinders into the arms of her pilot. If Shaw and Monaghan make the footwork light and fantastic, they also deliver visceral despair and longing when war-time circumstances separate them – it’s this shadow of historical reality, ever-present in Bourne’s vividly-detailed narrative, that so movingly frames their re-union with wartime partings that wouldn’t always have this fairy-tale ending. A prospect compellingly evoked by this truly outstanding company.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here