The multi-coloured manifesto leaflets have been distributed and have now fallen like confetti on the path towards the library. This can only mean one thing: election season has a grip on students again.
I'm talking about the race to become the new rector of the University of St Andrews last week, and the imminent elections for rector at the University of Aberdeen.
A rector holds the highest position in the University Court and the Court is the governing body of the University. This position only applies to Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Glasgow, Dundee and Aberdeen.
It's quite a powerful position, to put it mildly. Apart from anything else, the very well paid and powerful Principal must report to the rector. What a power trip.
Last week was campaign week in St Andrews and we had five very different candidates ranging from the socialist, Colin Fox, to the very Conservative Lord Michael Forsyth.
Anyone believing St Andrews' reputation for being an extension of the private school playground should think again, as every political belief was represented.
The winner was Alistair Moffat, previous director of STV and the Edinburgh Fringe, an all round nice guy with a similar appearance to Santa Claus or a teddy bear. A self-proclaimed 'father figure' for the students.
His victory was a triumph for his campaign team and the 1956 people who voted for him. But now that we recycle the leaflets and take down the homemade banners from flat windows, will people forget the person they elected?
Will anyone pose the question of why we there isn't a student on the Court? If this position is elected by the students for the students, why isn't it a student?
Call me cynical, but aren't we students being blinded by the campaign confetti thrown in our faces and the excitement of another election and chance to exercise our democratic right within a small community?
In 2007, the Scottish Rectors' Group issued a guidance document on the role of Rector. It states: “The right of the students to elect a rector does not entitle them to expect him/her to represent them in the meetings of the Court.”
Oh goody. We get to play at voting but we shouldn't really expect too much in return. If these are the rules the rector plays by, then why do they really need to listen to us in order to represent our views at the University Court?
I spoke to Alistair Moffat during his campaign week and he was the only candidate I saw actively speaking to students about their views and concerns. That is why he was voted in, because it was clear he cared. I do think he will make sure students voices are heard in Court meetings.
These meetings behind closed doors are when money matters are discussed. When money is such an issue in higher education and when universities seem to be on the threshold of becoming a business for financial gain and not for the intellectual gain of students, there absolutely has to be a rector on the side of students present at those meetings.
I'll be going along to Moffat's surgeries to keep up to date with the University Court and to make sure this rector is for the students and not just elected by the students.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article