BARCLAYS chairman Marcus Agius was made aware of regulators' investigation into manipulation of the Libor interest rate at the time the bank promoted Bob Diamond to chief executive, according to Financial Services Authority documents.
Mr Diamond was promoted from head of Barclays' investment bank to oversee the group in 2010.Mr Agius had said previously that the FSA had not raised the Libor investigation when it approved his appointment.
In June Barclays was handed a £290 million fine for attempted fixing of Libor. Mr Agius, followed by Mr Diamond and two other directors, resigned soon after.
The FSA released minutes of a meeting between its chief executive Hector Sants and Mr Agius to the Treasury Select Committee of backbench MPs.
The document reported that at a meeting in September of 2010, Mr Sants "briefed" Mr Agius about the ongoing investigation by US and UK authorities into manipulation of Libor.
According to the minutes, Mr Sants said it agreed Mr Diamond's appointment "on the basis that the current view of the investigation does not have an adverse effect", but said it could change its position.
In a letter to committee chairman Andrew Tyrie, Mr Sants wrote: "I specifically made clear that we reserved the right to re-assess his suitability in the light of the conclusions reached by this investigation and requested they make this clear to Mr Diamond."
The file note also said Mr Sants told Mr Agius that the regulator's relationship with Mr Diamond had to improve.
It said: "HS [Mr Sants] explained that the relationship with BD [Mr Diamond] had not reached the level of openness, transparency and willingness to air issues with the FSA as is the case with John Varley [Barclays' outgoing chief executive]."
The note also recorded Mr Agius said "whilst BD [Mr Diamond] is very competitive ... he suspects he will now see him mature and relax given he has now achieved his goal" of becoming chief executive.
In his reply to Mr Sants, Mr Tyrie said information was "at variance with the impression we received from Mr Agius".
Barclays did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article