FORMER Royal Bank of Scotland staffer Jayne-Anne Gadhia, who now runs Edinburgh-based Virgin Money, has said banks knew there were problems with payment protection insurance (PPI) but kept on selling it.
Meanwhile, Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester has again warned the Government that industry reform plans risk creating problems.
"The industry knew there was a problem with PPI but no-one was prepared to be the first mover," Ms Gadhia told the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards.
She spent five years with RBS until 2006, overseeing the Virgin One account it then managed.
PPI has been highly costly for the industry. RBS booked another £400m charge last month – bringing the provision so far to £1.7 billion. Lloyds Banking Group, owner of Bank of Scotland, has put aside £5.3bn.
Ms Gadhia told the commission that the key to stimulating competition within the sector was making it easier for customers to switch accounts.
Benny Higgins, chief executive of another Edinburgh-based challenger, Tesco Bank, told the inquiry that switching rates for personal current accounts are just 3% a year, against 20% in the grocery market.
From next September new rules come into place to give banks a seven-day deadline to transfer a customer to a competitor.
RBS chief executive Stephen Hester attacked a cornerstone of the Government's banking reform agenda by warning that plans to protect their retail banking operations by ring-fencing them from riskier activities such as investment banking could create a "moral hazard". He said: "You are giving a charter in everyone's minds for the next time there is a problem inside the ring fence, it [the bank] gets bailed out by one mechanism or another."
Lloyds chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio called for retail banks to be able to offer derivative products, a practice from which they could be barred under current ring-fencing plans.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article