Alliance Trust has completed the restructuring of its £2.5 billion portfolio and now holds just 100 stocks, half the number it held earlier this year.
For the first time since the mid-1980s, the biggest holding in the Dundee-based trust, which dates back to 1888, is an overseas company, Pfizer.
The Swiss pharmaceutical giant now accounts for 2.6% of total assets, just ahead of Royal Dutch Shell, which was at 2.4% at the end of October.
Next come Qualcomm, (US technology), Samsung, and Enterprise Products (US energy).
GlaxoSmithKline and Diageo are the only other UK companies in Alliance's top 10 holdings.
The top 20 holdings have seen 11 newcomers since June and increased their share of the portfolio from 30% to 32% in October alone, which Alliance said was "evidence of the desire to increase the level of conviction the trust has in each of its investments".
Information technology has seen the biggest increase in exposure – though seventh-largest holding Apple will have seen its value decline of late.
Ilario Di Bon, chief investment officer, said: "The recent dynamic restructuring of the portfolio has resulted in a significant change at the top.
"With the UK market set to be muted at best during 2013 we are looking further afield and are finding stock-specific opportunities which accord with our long-term thematic investment approach.
"More than half the holdings now in the top 20 investments are listed outside the UK as we invest in high-quality stocks which will continue to perform during the economic cycle."
The restructuring was unveiled only three months ago by chief executive Katherine Garrett-Cox, as the trust closed three funds in its unit trust subsidiary and merged its regional equity portfolios into one global portfolio under Mr Di Bon.
Ms Garrett-Cox said the trust had comprised 450 stocks when she joined Alliance five years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article