ROYAL Bank of Scotland's disposal programme received another setback after a deal to sell an Indian business to HSBC fell through two years after it was agreed, sending the bank's shares down 1%.
Taxpayer-controlled RBS is now to wind down the operation instead.
The news follows an even bigger blow when Santander pulled out of an arrangement to acquire 316 RBS branches in the UK in October.
RBS, which is 82% Government-owned, had agreed in July 2010 to sell its Indian retail and commercial business to HSBC for £63 million over the tangible net asset value of the operation.
The deal had originally been expected to complete in the first half of 2011.
Neither side specified the reasons for the deal collapsing although HSBC noted that it lapsed "without all conditions required to close the transaction being satisfied".
HSBC said it "remains committed to pursuing growth in India" through its existing operations. Under chief executive Stuart Gulliver's cost-cutting plan, HSBC has been pulling back from some markets.
RBS said its Indian business was profitable with £190m of assets and generated revenue of £42m in the first nine months of this year. It operates from 31 branches and serves 400,000 customers.
RBS has been scaling back its balance sheet as it seeks to recover from its near-collapse.
But the Bank of England warned this week that banks will have to scale back further, or raise more capital, to protect themselves from likely loan losses and regulatory fines.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article