ANNUAL UK inflation remained significantly above target at 2.7% in December, as hikes in gas and electricity bills prevented it from falling back, official figures show.
And economists predict that inflation could increase in the short term, citing further rises in utility bills and the potential for bad harvests to push up food prices.
Annual consumer prices index (CPI) inflation in December, which compares with a 2% target set for the Bank of England by the Treasury, was unchanged from the rates in October and November and was in line with City forecasts.
The Office for National Statistics noted as it published the data yesterday that, although the annual inflation rate remained unchanged, this reflected a balancing out of big upward and downward influences.
The ONS said the rise in electricity and gas bills exerted the biggest upward influence on the annual inflation rate last month, as several companies raised their prices. It calculated annual electricity and gas price inflation at 3.9% and 5.2% respectively.
Air fares exerted the largest downward pressure on the annual CPI inflation rate in December, rising at a far slower rate than a year earlier, the ONS noted.
Annual inflation on the old all-items retail prices index measure edged up from 3% in November to 3.1% in December, with the ONS citing utility bill increases as the largest contributor to this rise.
Howard Archer, chief UK economist at consultancy IHS Global Insight, said: "It still looks very possible that increased energy tariffs and higher food prices could push consumer price inflation up to 3% early in 2013 and keep it there for a while.
"Further utility price hikes will kick in during January, while bad harvests look likely to push food prices higher."
He predicted annual CPI inflation would hover around 3% during the first half of 2013, before falling back later in the year.
He added: "Consumer price inflation up at 2.7% is putting a significant squeeze on consumers' purchasing power given that latest data show that annual earnings growth was only half this rate at 1.3% in October. This is worrying for growth prospects in 2013, as much will depend on how much consumers spend."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article