Scottish farmers appear to have escaped the massive cuts to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) budget they were dreading following yesterday's deal at the EU budget summit.
However, the fine details of the CAP regulations have still to be worked out, as only headline figures have been agreed.
The budget for direct support payments, or Pillar 1 as it is known to farmers, appears to have been cut by 17% to 18%.
That funding pot is down from €337 billion (£285bn) for the period 2007 to 2013 to €278bn.
The budget for environmental payments and rural development, known as Pillar 11, appears to have been cut by between 6% and 7% to €85bn.
How those global figures will be distributed between member states has still to be negotiated, so it is too early to accurately predict the final implications for Scottish farmers.
However, SNP MEP Alyn Smith welcomed the deal and said: "On balance, I think we can live with this, not least because a lot of the convergence issues across and within member states have yet to be worked out.
"I've long said there is ample scope for the EU budget to work a bit harder, and it should not be immune from austerity at a time when all other budgets in council chambers and national parliaments the length of Europe are under pressure.
"The cuts, such as they are, are largely to the budgets that are essentially proposals, rather than existing budget lines."
He added: "Clearly, there is still a lot of water to go under the bridge on this yet."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article