PREMIUM bonds dealer National Savings & Investments is to leave its monolithic premises to the south of Glasgow, raising the prospect of a battle for the 70-acre site from property developers.
NS&I has occupied the site at Cowglen since the then National Savings Bank was decentralised from its London headquarters into four units in the early 1970s, with other sites at Blackpool and Durham.
The Glasgow office was built to house 6000 people but currently there are only 650, involved in processing transactions and answering customer enquiries. Half of the building is unused.
The state-owned group had to choose between a major refurbishment or finding another premises, and confirmed it is looking for a new home in the city centre.
It is understood to have narrowed down its options to six existing buildings with a view to moving in March 2014.
NS&I insisted there would be no change to the number of Glasgow employees. According to industry sources, however, the company's requirement is for between 40,000sqft and 60,000sqft.
Although NS&I would not comment on this, the commercial property industry works on a rule of thumb of 100sqft per person. On that basis, the requirement will be seen as somewhat low.
Alan Brown, full-time officer at the Public and Commercial Services union, said it had not been consulted and was not expecting a decision until the new management contract for NS&I is awarded in April. It is currently held by Atos.
He said: "We are waiting to see the proposals. If it's an alternative site close by and it's somewhere that the staff can travel to within a reasonable time, there's not going to be any issue."
A source in the property industry said the Cowglen site was likely to attract "substantial interest" from the market if it is put up for sale, and would be particularly attractive to housebuilders.
A spokesman for NS&I said the process was at a "relatively early stage". He added: "We have decided not to go ahead with redeveloping Cowglen and are actively looking at other options."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article