THE Government should loosen rules for the National Employment Savings Trust that forms the centrepiece (Nest) of its plans for pension auto-enrolment, according to the work and pensions committee chaired by Aberdeen South MP Dame Anne Begg.
Dame Anne said the Government should lift the cap on contributions and allow transfers in and out, so employers do not opt for rival but potentially more expensive private schemes with fewer restrictions.
The introduction of auto-enrolment, which means employees have to actively opt out of contributing to a pension, began in October.
"Since auto-enrolment began, the case for lifting the restrictions has become even more powerful, and the need for action more pressing," Dame Anne said.
"For auto-enrolment to continue to work successfully, Nest must be allowed to thrive."
The Nest scheme is designed to be low-cost and simple to use. Thousands of companies are expected to make use of it over the coming six years as millions of private-sector workers begin saving for retirement for the first time.
The committee wants a relaxation of rules that cap contributions to a member's scheme at £4400 currently and prevent members from transferring money in and out to other schemes.
Dame Anne said: "The cap on annual contributions to Nest means that employers can't opt for Nest for their higher-earners or if they want to make more generous contributions. "
Groups including Age UK, Which?, the Federation of Small Businesses and the Trades Union Congress have already written to pensions minister, Steve Webb, calling for the restrictions to be relaxed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article