Profits at BAE Systems dipped by 7% in 2012, a year dominated by US budget cuts and its failure to seal a merger with Airbus firm EADS.
BAE's sales reduced by 7% to £17.8 billion in 2012 while the company warned that defence spending in the UK and United States, where it generated 20% of its revenues last year, was expected to continue to be constrained.
However, contracts outside the two countries more than doubled last year to £11.2 billion, leading to an 8% increase in its order backlog to £42 billion.
With reduced activity in support of US operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, BAE has targeted growth in cyber, intelligence and security businesses.
It has also reduced headcount by 3,600 over the last year, bringing the total reduction over the past four years to around 26,000 worldwide.
Profits fell 6.6% to £1.37 billion today but BAE said that it expected a return to earnings per share growth this year, subject to near-term uncertainties in US budgets and the final terms of a key fighter jet contract with Saudi Arabia.
Shares rose more than 4% following the update today.
BAE was recently boosted by Oman's order of 12 Typhoons and eight Hawk trainer jets, worth around £2.5 billion including support packages. But delivery of both aircraft is not expected to start until 2017.
The company was forced to scrap its tie-up with EADS after political wrangling scuppered the two companies' plans to create the world's biggest defence and aerospace group, with combined sales of around £60 billion.
It said today that focus on underlying business performance was "sustained as a priority" while the merger discussions were under way.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article