Scotland's hotels outstripped the rest of the UK in both occupancy and revenues last year amid a mixed picture for the sector, according to the latest report by accountants and business advisers PKF.
The annual figures, influenced heavily by a buoyant Aberdeen, show Scottish hotel occupancy was up 0.3% year-on-year to 73.9% compared to 70.7% in "regional UK" and 70.2% in England. Rooms yield (the industry measure of revenue) was down 0.3% year on year at £50.02 compared with £42.43 in regional UK and £41.43 in England.
Edinburgh suffered a surprise fall of 2% in occupancy and 4% in revenue over the course of 2012, whereas Aberdeen saw occupancy rise by 5.7% and revenues soar by 11.1%.
Glasgow battled to an occupancy increase of 0.8%, while revenue fell 0.4%. In Inverness, occupancy increased by 1.5% and revenue by 0.6%.
Alastair Rae, a partner in the Real Estate and Hospitality sector at PKF, said: "These figures reveal just how difficult 2012 was for the hospitality sector. Edinburgh was worst hit with reduced occupancy and revenue. Glasgow and Inverness did well to stay broadly in positive territory. Aberdeen had a very successful year on the back of high oil prices."
He went on: "Although revenue in Edinburgh hotels remained relatively high at £55.84, the concern is that occupancy averaged less than Aberdeen, Glasgow or Inverness for the year, which is extremely unusual and indicative of just how difficult last year was for the capital."
Mr Rae warned: "With little sign of any improvement in the wider economy, it is likely that we will see more of the same during 2013. Hoteliers are being battered by an unforgiving economic storm which will be eroding the surpluses that remain from better trading periods."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article