THE Bank of England has shied away from placing additional restrictions on banks' balance sheets in favour of waiting for international agreements.
The Bank's Financial Policy Committee, whose job it is to protect the financial system, said it "would return to these issues once an international agreement on the definition of the leverage ratio had been reached".
The leverage ratio requires banks to hold capital in proportion to their assets. In the UK it is currently set at 3% of total non-risk weighted assets but there has been pressure to raise this limit.
The global Basel committee of banking supervisors is expected to finalise a definition of the leverage ratio in the coming days.
The pressure for change is because British banks are widely believed to have become over-leveraged in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.
Royal Bank of Scotland had a leverage ratio of 31.2 in 2007, meaning that its total assets were worth 31 times its capital. But at HSBC, which weathered the crisis better than most, the ratio was a comparatively conservative 21.3.
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) said it is doing further work on how banks calculate their capital buffers due to concern that the figures can be massaged.
Minutes to the discussion, which took place on November 20, showed committee members disagreed about whether to force banks to use a standardised approach, which could cost banks £40 million.
But they recorded no disagreement with the key decision at the meeting to refocus the Bank's Funding for Lending scheme towards small businesses.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article