Primark revealed "excellent" Christmas trading today as the discount chain maintained its squeeze on struggling rival Marks & Spencer.
Sales for the Europe-wide business rose 14% in the 16 weeks to January 4, driven by an 8% increase in selling space and more strong growth at stores which have been trading for more than year.
In contrast to the performances of Primark and rival Next, which has already posted a surge in sales, M&S's general merchandise sales were down 2.1% for the 13 weeks to December 28. Its boss, Marc Bolland, blamed a vicious Christmas price war for the decline.
Primark, which has 161 of its 257 stores in the UK, is on course for further profits growth this year, on top of the 44% jump in profits to £514 million recently announced for the year to September.
Its owner, Associated British Foods, said that like-for-like growth already achieved and further store expansion meant Primark's profit "will be well ahead of last year".
AB Foods, which also owns leading food brands Ryvita, Twinings and Kingsmill, said Primark's strong performance offset a 28% fall in revenues at its sugar business due to a slump in global prices.
Sales volumes at Kingsmill owner Allied Bakeries were higher despite strong competition, while Twinings Ovaltine saw strong growth for tea in the UK and United States.
Anusha Couttigane, an analyst at retail consultancy Conlumino, said: "Primark remains the jewel in the crown for Associated British Foods.
"Primark is no longer the only retailer to offer fast, seriously cheap, fashion. However, the company's sustained reaction to fast fashion means it is still the number one destination for many buying into temporary trends on a budget.
"It is, therefore, unsurprising that this Christmas established Primark as the prime destination for onesies, capitalising on a key winterwear trend."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article