EDINBURGH-based Scottish Widows Partnership has been named among the laggards in wealth manager Bestinvest's latest Spot the Dog report on the poorest-performing investment funds.
The house, which is to be swallowed by Aberdeen Asset Management after current owner Lloyds Banking Group agreed to offload it in a £550 million deal, is one of just three houses to have three funds on the list.
Bestinvest's report has identified those funds that have underperformed their markets in each of the last three years and that have also fallen by more than 10%.
Bestinvest managing director Jason Hollands said: "All funds and managers go through periods of difficult performance during their careers, so we are not saying investors should automatically switch out of these funds.
"However, if you hold any dogs, you certainly need to explore further whether you should continue to give it more time to recover or whether it may be better to move elsewhere."
The three SWIP funds, among 53 identified as "dogs" by Bestinvest, were SWIP UK Opportunities, Scottish Widows UK Select Growth and Scottish Widows Pacific Growth.
A spokeswoman said: "SWIP is committed to delivering excellent performance across all its funds, including those mentioned in this survey.
"These funds represent less than 0.5% of our total funds under management."
F&C, the fund manager with a large Edinburgh presence and Prudential's investment arm M&G were the only other houses to have three funds named as so-called "dogs" by Bestinvest.
Describing SWIP as a "serial offender" in running below-par funds, Bestinvest said in its report: "With SWIP being acquired by Aberdeen, perhaps this is the final farewell."
Scottish fund houses Artemis and Standard Life Investments were among a small elite of providers with no funds on the "dogs" list.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article