Aberdeen Asset Management's shares have suffered a further fall, leaving them 21.7% down in the year to date, amid worries that emerging markets are in for a tough time.
Investors have become jittery as China's economy has slowed and the US Federal Reserve begins its two-day policy meeting today, during which it could decide to begin withdrawing the supply of cheap money that many think have supported share prices.
Aberdeen is especially vulnerable because many of its highest-regarded funds are invested in emerging markets.
Its shares closed down 6p or 1.5% on the day at 391.3p. They had finished 2013 at 500p.
Espirito Santo analyst Phil Dobbin said: "Aberdeen remains a cash generative asset manager, which has over time demonstrated strong operational results and an improving blended fee dynamic.
"We believe that at the current price the shares retain strong value characteristics, but the company needs to demonstrate that it can return to more normal levels of gross sales and repair the damage to its short-term equity fund performance."
Earlier this month the Scottish house revealed it had suffered net outflows of £4.4 billion in the final quarter of its financial year.
The downward trajectory has not deterred Aberdeen non-executive Richard Mully, who splashed out £60,000 on the company's shares. The former investment banker bought 15,000 shares at 400p each, Aberdeen announced to the stock market yesterday. This is the first share purchase he has made since joining the board in April 2012.
Dominic Rossi, global chief investment officer for equities at rival funds house Fidelity Worldwide, said: "We have seen this movie before. One EM (emerging market) country after another gets left stranded on the shore as the tide goes out. The weakest ones first, Argentina and Turkey, soon to be followed by Brazil, Russia and others."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article