REGULAR readers will recall last week's lead story, an update on the case against Transport Scotland (TS) being brought by Southampton-based Nationwide Gritting Services (NGS).
It concerns the salt TS bought in the winters of 2010 and 2011 to make available to the NHS, local councils and other Scottish agencies to put a floor on top of the horrific ice rink that covered the country for endless weeks on both occasions.
NGS objected to TS's failure to follow the procurement rules and advertise the salt requirement with the European Union. Claiming to be the only gritting company of scale in the UK not to get a piece of the action, it originally sought damages of £980,000.
Last week's story reported that NGS was seeking court permission to raise the claim to over £3.5 million on the grounds that it has discovered since bringing the original action that TS bought far more salt than it thought. This is mainly because much additional salt was bought by trunk road operator BEAR Scotland, which as a private company is not subject to the same procurement rules unless it can be shown it was acting on behalf of TS.
TS argued in court last Wednesday that too much time had passed since the revelations about BEAR for NGS to be allowed to add them to the claim, but Lord Woolman was having none of it. When the full case finally comes to court in May, TS is now facing a claim of £3.85m. There must be a few senior folks getting hot under the collar at TS towers …
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article