Brian the Robot took star billing in car insurer Admiral's results today after ad land's latest creation helped drive a jump in Confused.com's profits.
The car insurance group said its price comparison site, which was set up more than a decade ago, grew profits by 19% last year to £21.7 million on the back of the successful TV advertising campaign featuring the robot.
In a fiercely competitive market in which rivals upped their advertising spend, Admiral said Confused maintained its market share in the year.
Across the group, which insures around 3.7 million vehicles, Admiral said profits rose 7% to £370 million during a "solid but not flashy year".
Turnover fell 8% to £2.03 billion as Admiral opted not to chase the market lower following a two-year period in which industry rates have fallen 25%.
Chief executive Henry Engelhardt said: "We made more money than ever before, we grew customer numbers a little bit, we launched one new overseas business, but there was no growth surge, there were no claims shocks; we just went about our business."
The performance means 7,000 staff at Cardiff-based group will divide up £10.5 million of shares through an employee share scheme. The current maximum award for each year is £3,000 per employee.
Admiral's combined ratio was below 90%, with a figure above 100% meaning a company is paying out more money in claims than it is receiving.
Mr Engelhardt added: "If the UK market doesn't turn soon, some people might say it will hurt Admiral. That might be true. But it will hurt our competitors earlier and harder, as they are largely unable to match our combined ratio. A slower turn will only mean a sharper turn when the turn turns."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article