The UK potentially faces the same issues in a vote on membership of the European Union as Scotland faces in its referendum, a leading economist has said in Edinburgh.
In either case, a rejection of the status quo would mean the pragmatic renegotiation of relationships between institutions, Gerard Lyons told the final day of the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) investment conference.
Mr Lyons, 25 years in the City and now economic adviser to the London mayor Boris Johnson, said: "The relationship between the UK and the rest of Europe is as significant an issue as that between Scotland and the rest of the UK."
But while power was already devolving to Edinburgh, it was centralising on Brussels.
In the financial sector, a Yes vote in the Scottish referendum could destabilise the balance between London and Edinburgh if firms were forced to move south, Mr Lyons said.
He added: "It doesn't do the UK any good to have everything centred on London."
The economist noted that while Berlin accounted for 4% of the German economy and Paris 9% of France's, London was now 25% of the UK gross value-added economy generating around £309 billion.
That compares with Manchester on £51bn, Glasgow on £18bn and Edinburgh at £17bn.
While speaking at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre yesterday, Mr Lyons said if the UK had a referendum on EU membership, "in some respects it would be like the debate in Scotland - it is about the subsequent relationships of the institutions we set up and how would they work".
He added: "Even if Britain were to leave, it is difficult to imagine London not remaining the wholesale financial centre of Europe - but it is opening up the whole retail sector that is still the big upside."
Mr Lyons said his high 2% growth forecast for the UK last year had proved about right, and he now expected growth of 3.5% to 4% this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article