Marks & Spencer delivered better-than-expected sales figures today amid signs of a revival for its struggling womenswear business.
The retailer said clothing sales rose 0.6% on an underlying basis in the 13 weeks to March 29, driven by "clear signs of improvement" in womenswear following last autumn's relaunch of its M&S Collection.
Marks said in a trading update: "Customers are responding well to our refocus on quality and style."
Across general merchandise, which includes homewares as well as clothing, like-for-like sales were 0.6% lower in the quarter.
It means the company has suffered three years of declines in the division, although today's figure was better than the 1% fall expected in the City.
The company, which has hired new senior personnel and launched a celebrity marketing push in a bid to revive its fashion business, said the improved performance came in the face of high levels of discounting.
It added: "Despite some improvement in consumer confidence, we remain cautious about the outlook. Our focus is on continuing to transform Marks & Spencer into an international, multi-channel retailer."
Marks said its food department had a "great quarter", with the later timing of Easter failing to prevent an 18th quarter in a row of like-for-like growth.
Shares opened more than 2% higher today in the wake of the resilient sales performance, which was offset by continued pressure on margins.
Annual results are due to be published on May 20, with City expectations ahead of today's update pencilling in a 6% fall in profits to £623 million.
It will mean the 130-year-old company being overtaken for the first time by rival Next - a relative upstart at 32 years old - which last month announced profits of £695 million.
Freddie George, a retail analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald, kept his sell rating on the stock today and warned the profits figure could go as low as £610 million.
He added: "We continue to believe it will take a number of seasons before the existing team is able to manifest a marked improvement in performance in womenswear."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article